Home / Token cost / OrgX

The OrgX MCP server costs 24,130 tokens before the first call.

Every request your agent makes carries every tool definition this server exposes — context your code, documents and conversation can't use, mostly for tools the agent never calls. You don't need them all in the window, and you don't have to pay for them.

QUICK ANSWER The OrgX MCP server's 29 tool definitions consume 24,130 tokens — 12% of a 200k context window, and 13× the median MCP server (1,901 tokens). A scoped grant exposing only the tools you use cuts that roughly in proportion.

MEASURED FROM SCHEMAS tiktoken o200k_base · rank #39 of 3,219 measured servers · refreshed every build Method →

What that costs before your agent starts working.

Tool definitions are overhead: they occupy context on every request and compete with your code, documents and conversation history for the same window.

200K WINDOW 12%
1M WINDOW 2.4%

Corpus context: OrgX ranks #39 of 3,219 measured MCP servers by definition cost. The median is 1,901 tokens, p90 is 7,953, and the heaviest (Fusionauth) is 183,337 — 92% of a 200k window on its own.

Where the 24,130 tokens go.

Each row is one tool definition as a tools/list entry — name, description and input schema — counted with o200k_base. Average: 832 tokens per tool.

ToolCategoryTokens% of server
scaffold_initiative Execute 2,682 11.1%
orgx_write Write 1,857 7.7%
orgx_submit_receipt Write 1,446 6.0%
orgx_act Destructive 1,287 5.3%
spawn_agent_task Execute 1,249 5.2%
orgx_spawn Write 1,192 4.9%
orgx_attach Write 1,141 4.7%
orgx_emit_activity Execute 1,069 4.4%
orgx_decide Write 928 3.8%
orgx_plan Write 867 3.6%
approve_agent_work Write 718 3.0%
consolidate_pr Read 695 2.9%
orgx_recommend Read 628 2.6%
recommend_next_action Execute 590 2.4%
orgx_search Read 585 2.4%
orgx_inspect Read 562 2.3%
delegate_agent_task Write 561 2.3%
get_operator_chronicle Read 553 2.3%
orgx_bootstrap Read 549 2.3%
handoff_task Execute 538 2.2%
query_org_memory Read 535 2.2%
get_agent_status Read 531 2.2%
approve_decision Write 508 2.1%
review_artifact Read 504 2.1%
get_initiative_pulse Read 497 2.1%
reject_decision Write 492 2.0%
recall_memory Read 468 1.9%
get_morning_brief Read 462 1.9%
track_project_progress Read 436 1.8%

Your agent uses a handful of these tools. It pays for all 29.

You don't need all 29 of those definitions in the window. PolicyLayer is an MCP gateway that sits in front of OrgX: only the tools you grant are exposed to the agent, the rest never load. A smaller window means a sharper agent — less noise when it picks a tool — and every request costs less:

Grant scopeDefinition costReduction
All 29 tools (no gateway) 24,130 tokens
3 granted tools ~2,496 tokens −90%
5 granted tools ~4,160 tokens −83%
10 granted tools ~8,321 tokens −66%

The risk dividend: 1 of these 29 tools are critical-risk (destructive or financial) and cost 1,287 tokens (5% of the definition load). Block them — the recommended starter policy — and you reclaim that context before tuning anything else.

  1. Create a free account and register OrgX — nothing to install.
  2. Grant only the tools you use — ungranted definitions never enter the context window.
  3. Point your MCP client (Claude, Cursor, anything) at your gateway URL.
CUT ORGX TOKEN COST →

Free to start. No card required.

OrgX token-cost questions.

How many tokens does the OrgX MCP server use?+

Its 29 tool definitions total 24,130 tokens — 12% of a 200k context window — measured with tiktoken o200k_base over the serialised tools/list payload. Exact counts vary slightly by client and model.

Why does OrgX consume tokens before I send a message?+

MCP clients load every connected server's tool definitions — name, description, and input schema — into the model's context so it knows what it can call. That payload is charged against your context window on every request, whether or not a tool is used.

How do I reduce OrgX's token usage?+

Expose fewer tools. A PolicyLayer grant scopes OrgX to only the tools you allow — ungranted definitions are filtered out of the tool list, so they never enter the context window. A grant of 3 typical tools costs roughly 2,496 tokens, a 90% reduction.

Does deferred tool loading fix this?+

Partially, in some clients. Claude Code defers MCP tool schemas behind a tool-search step by default, and VS Code has experimental grouping — but you still pay tokens per search and reload, and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load definitions upfront. Reducing the exposed tool set cuts the cost in every client.

How these numbers were measured.

01
Serialisation

Each tool is serialised as a tools/list entry — name, description, input schema — from the schemas in the PolicyLayer scan database. Clients differ slightly in framing, so treat counts as close estimates.

02
Tokeniser

tiktoken o200k_base (GPT-4o/o-series). Anthropic's current tokeniser isn't published, so Claude's exact counts will differ; for English text and JSON schemas the totals are close enough to treat these as estimates.

03
Deferred loading

Some clients now defer schema loading (Claude Code's tool search; VS Code experimental grouping). You still pay per search and reload — and Cursor, Windsurf and Gemini CLI load everything upfront.

Computed 11-06-2026 from the PolicyLayer scan database over all 29 catalogued OrgX tools. Counts refresh with every site build.

Expose only the tools you use — the rest never enter your context.

A PolicyLayer grant scopes OrgX to the tools you actually allow. Ungranted definitions never load, and every call that does run is checked against policy first.

Free to start. No card required.

42,500+ MCP servers and 110,000+ tools scanned and risk-classified.

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.