New Your team’s decisions, in one playbook every coding agent works from. Never answer your agent twice

audit_history

THE LAST AUDIT ON FILE FOR AN ACCOUNT, IN FULL. Pass who (an X handle). Rendered from the snapshot's own stored card — what the audit actually concluded, not a re-run. The grade and organic score, the account's followers / following / posts, median engagement units and estimated honest rate, EVER...

SERVERRokha SOURCEhttps://rokha.ai/mcp/jsonrpc
Low RISK CLASS
Category Read
Parameters 11 required
Recommended Allowedsee the rule below
Registry record Grade F, identity unverified Pull the record →

This record as markdown: /tools/ai-rokha-rokha/audit-history.md

What audit_history does on Rokha

AI agents call audit_history to retrieve information from Rokha without modifying anything. It is typically the context-gathering step in research, monitoring, and reporting workflows, before the agent takes action elsewhere.

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
who string Yes

Parameters from the server's own tool schema.

Why audit_history is rated Low

Retrieves stored audit data for an account; no side effects or modifications.

From the tool's definition THE LAST AUDIT ON FILE... Rendered from the snapshot's own stored card

Risk signalsBulk/mass operation — affects multiple targets

Questions about audit_history

What does the audit_history tool do? +

THE LAST AUDIT ON FILE FOR AN ACCOUNT, IN FULL. Pass who (an X handle). Rendered from the snapshot's own stored card — what the audit actually concluded, not a re-run. The grade and organic score, the account's followers / following / posts, median engagement units and estimated honest rate, EVERY FLAG WITH ITS SIGNED POINT DELTA (the score is their sum — showing them is what makes the number arguable), where the engagement comes from, and Rokha's written read. Audits are informational — since 2026-09-24 they do not change Tailwind scoring. Public, no auth. It is categorised as a Read tool in the Rokha MCP Server, which means it retrieves data without modifying state.

What parameters does audit_history accept? +

audit_history accepts 1 parameter: who. Required: who. The full parameter table on this page comes from the server's own tool schema.

How do I enforce a policy on audit_history? +

Register the Rokha MCP server in PolicyLayer and add a rule for audit_history: allow, deny, rate-limit, or require approval. Point your MCP client at the PolicyLayer proxy URL and the rule is enforced on every call, before it reaches Rokha. Nothing to install.

What risk level is audit_history? +

audit_history is a Read tool with low risk. Read-only tools are generally safe to allow by default.

Can I rate-limit audit_history? +

Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the audit_history rule in your PolicyLayer policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.

How do I block audit_history completely? +

Set action: deny in the PolicyLayer policy for audit_history. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.

What MCP server provides audit_history? +

audit_history is provided by the Rokha MCP server (https://rokha.ai/mcp/jsonrpc). PolicyLayer sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.

More on Rokha, and thousands of servers like it.

Across the catalogue

// THE MCP REGISTRY

PolicyLayer tracks 44,603 MCP servers and 515,000+ tools.

Every server has a live record: who publishes it, whether it answers without auth, its risk grade, every tool classified, the recommended policy. This page is one line of Rokha's. Pull the full record:

Teams ship this data inside their own products. See what a licence covers →

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.