browse_wait_for
Wait for a CSS selector to appear on the current page (for async/SPA pages after a click or navigate, before you snapshot/act). Returns ok once present, else an honest timeout.
This record as markdown: /tools/com-wingmanprotocol-agent-gateway/browse-wait-for.md
What browse_wait_for does on Gateway
AI agents invoke browse_wait_for to trigger actions in Gateway. What it does depends on the arguments the agent supplies, and its effects often reach beyond the immediate call: builds kicked off, notifications sent, workflows started.
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
selector | string | Yes | CSS selector to wait for |
browser_id | string | Yes | from browse_open |
timeout_ms | integer | — | max wait (default 8000) |
Parameters from the server's own tool schema.
Why browse_wait_for is rated High
This tool interacts with a live browser session, waiting for DOM elements to appear. It is part of a browser automation workflow (alongside click/navigate actions), making it an Execute-category tool — it triggers and coordinates browser-side operations. While it doesn't directly execute code, it gates and enables further browser actions, and misuse could facilitate manipulation of web sessions.
From the tool's definition 'Wait for a CSS selector to appear on the current page (for async/SPA pages after a click or navigate, before you snapshot/act)'
Attacks that exploit this kind of access
The rule that runs browse_wait_for safely
PolicyLayer is an MCP gateway: it sits between your AI agents and Gateway, and checks every tool call against a rule you set before the call runs. Nothing changes on the server itself. For browse_wait_for, this is the rule to start with:
browse_wait_for stays usable, but rate-capped: a runaway agent can't fire it dozens of times a minute. Everything else on the server is denied unless you say otherwise.
The button opens the PolicyLayer dashboard: create your workspace, connect Gateway, apply this rule, and every browse_wait_for call is checked against it from then on.
Questions about browse_wait_for
Wait for a CSS selector to appear on the current page (for async/SPA pages after a click or navigate, before you snapshot/act). Returns ok once present, else an honest timeout. It is categorised as a Execute tool in the Gateway MCP Server, which means it can trigger actions or run processes. Use rate limits and argument validation.
browse_wait_for accepts 3 parameters: selector, browser_id, timeout_ms. Required: selector, browser_id. The full parameter table on this page comes from the server's own tool schema.
Register the Gateway MCP server in PolicyLayer and add a rule for browse_wait_for: allow, deny, rate-limit, or require approval. Point your MCP client at the PolicyLayer proxy URL and the rule is enforced on every call, before it reaches Gateway. Nothing to install.
browse_wait_for is a Execute tool with high risk. Execute tools should be rate-limited and have argument validation enabled.
Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the browse_wait_for rule in your PolicyLayer policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.
Set action: deny in the PolicyLayer policy for browse_wait_for. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.
browse_wait_for is provided by the Gateway MCP server (https://wingmanprotocol.com/mcp). PolicyLayer sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.
More on Gateway, and thousands of servers like it.
Across the catalogue