New Your team’s decisions, in one playbook every coding agent works from. Never answer your agent twice

check_address_poisoning

chainpeek: Check a transfer recipient for address poisoning: lookalikes in the sender's history. For balance, gas and blacklist checks too use transfer_preflight; for OFAC use check_sanctions. Returns a risk (high | medium | low) for paying to: reads from's transfers of one token (default USDC) o...

SERVERTanod SOURCEhttps://tanod.dev/mcp
Low RISK CLASS
Category Read
Parameters 73 required
Recommended Allowedsee the rule below
Registry record Grade F, identity unverified Pull the record →

This record as markdown: /tools/dev-tanod-tanod/check-address-poisoning.md

What check_address_poisoning does on Tanod

AI agents call check_address_poisoning to retrieve information from Tanod without modifying anything. It is typically the context-gathering step in research, monitoring, and reporting workflows, before the agent takes action elsewhere.

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
to string Yes The recipient about to be paid (0x + 40 hex). Must differ from `from`.
from string Yes The sending wallet whose transfer history is read (0x + 40 hex).
chain string Yes ethereum, base or robinhood (Robinhood Chain, chain id 4663).
token string — USDC (default), USDT, or a token contract address. Only this token's transfers are read. On robinhood pass a contract address.
contacts object — Up to 100 addresses you trust (your address book); `to` is compared with them too, without any chain read.
dust_threshold object — Incoming transfers below this many token units count as dust. Default 0.01 for USDC and USDT; off for other tokens unless set; 0 turns it off.
lookback_blocks integer — How many of the latest blocks of history to read (0-2,000; default 2,000, about 67 minutes on Base and 6.7 hours on Ethereum). 0 reads nothing and checks `conta

Parameters from the server's own tool schema.

Why check_address_poisoning is rated Low

Even though check_address_poisoning only reads data, uncontrolled read access leaks sensitive information and racks up API costs: an agent caught in a retry loop can make thousands of calls a minute without anyone noticing.

Risk signalsHandles credentials or secrets (token)

Questions about check_address_poisoning

What does the check_address_poisoning tool do? +

chainpeek: Check a transfer recipient for address poisoning: lookalikes in the sender's history. For balance, gas and blacklist checks too use transfer_preflight; for OFAC use check_sanctions. Returns a risk (high | medium | low) for paying to: reads from's transfers of one token (default USDC) over the last 2,000 blocks and finds addresses with to's first 4 and last 4 hex characters; each reason carries its evidence (tx hash, block, amount, direction). High: to was never paid and imitates an address from paid or a contact, or appears only in zero-value or dust transfers. Medium: a lookalike exists but to was paid or is a contact. Older history, other tokens and other lookalikes are not seen. Bad input is a 422, a failed read a 502 (neither charged). Typically 0.5-4 s. Price: USD 0.002. Free: 10 chain reads per IP per UTC day. Docs: https://tanod.dev/learn/address-poisoning-check-api.html. It is categorised as a Read tool in the Tanod MCP Server, which means it retrieves data without modifying state.

What parameters does check_address_poisoning accept? +

check_address_poisoning accepts 7 parameters: to, from, chain, token, contacts, dust_threshold, lookback_blocks. Required: to, from, chain. The full parameter table on this page comes from the server's own tool schema.

How do I enforce a policy on check_address_poisoning? +

Register the Tanod MCP server in PolicyLayer and add a rule for check_address_poisoning: allow, deny, rate-limit, or require approval. Point your MCP client at the PolicyLayer proxy URL and the rule is enforced on every call, before it reaches Tanod. Nothing to install.

What risk level is check_address_poisoning? +

check_address_poisoning is a Read tool with low risk. Read-only tools are generally safe to allow by default.

Can I rate-limit check_address_poisoning? +

Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the check_address_poisoning rule in your PolicyLayer policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.

How do I block check_address_poisoning completely? +

Set action: deny in the PolicyLayer policy for check_address_poisoning. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.

What MCP server provides check_address_poisoning? +

check_address_poisoning is provided by the Tanod MCP server (https://tanod.dev/mcp). PolicyLayer sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.

More on Tanod, and thousands of servers like it.

Across the catalogue

// THE MCP REGISTRY

PolicyLayer tracks 44,603 MCP servers and 515,000+ tools.

Every server has a live record: who publishes it, whether it answers without auth, its risk grade, every tool classified, the recommended policy. This page is one line of Tanod's. Pull the full record:

Teams ship this data inside their own products. See what a licence covers →

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.