New Your team’s decisions, in one playbook every coding agent works from. Never answer your agent twice

analyze_model_efficiency

[MAINTENANCE] 0fba4cb6 — MECHANICAL (zero-token) model-tier suggestion for a task or sprint item. Deterministic, rule/heuristic classifier: NO model call, NO DB, NO network — it mirrors how the ultracode orchestration script spends zero model tokens on routing. Pass a task descriptor (any of titl...

SERVERMeridian SOURCE@meridianmcp/mcp
Low RISK CLASS
Category Read
Parameters 60 required
Recommended Allowedsee the rule below
Registry record Grade F, identity unverified Pull the record →

This record as markdown: /tools/io-github-ajc3xc-meridian/analyze-model-efficiency.md

What analyze_model_efficiency does on Meridian

AI agents call analyze_model_efficiency to retrieve information from Meridian without modifying anything. It is typically the context-gathering step in research, monitoring, and reporting workflows, before the agent takes action elsewhere.

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
size string Optional explicit sprint-item size estimate (case-insensitive). Larger -> more expensive.
files array Alternative to file_count: the list of files touched; its length is used when file_count is omitted.
title string Task / sprint-item title. Scanned for cheap/expensive keyword signals.
file_count integer Number of files the task touches. Fewer files -> cheaper tier.
description string Optional longer description; also scanned for keyword signals.
touches_resources array Resources (DB/schema/infra/services) the task touches. May also be an integer count. More/any resources -> more expensive.

Parameters from the server's own tool schema.

Why analyze_model_efficiency is rated Low

This tool reads and analyzes task metadata (title, description, file_count, files, touches_resources, size) to produce a classification suggestion (tier: haiku|sonnet|opus). It performs no write operations, does not execute external code or queries, and does not modify any state. It is purely informational/analytical with no side effects, making it a Read category tool with low severity.

From the tool's definition Tool description states it is a 'MECHANICAL (zero-token) model-tier suggestion' that 'mirrors how the ultracode orchestration script spends zero model tokens on routing.' It 'returns a suggested tier' based on input analysis.

Questions about analyze_model_efficiency

What does the analyze_model_efficiency tool do? +

[MAINTENANCE] 0fba4cb6 — MECHANICAL (zero-token) model-tier suggestion for a task or sprint item. Deterministic, rule/heuristic classifier: NO model call, NO DB, NO network — it mirrors how the ultracode orchestration script spends zero model tokens on routing. Pass a task descriptor (any of title, description, file_count, files, touches_resources, size) and it returns a suggested tier: {tier: 'haiku'|'sonnet'|'opus', score, signals:[{signal, detail, weight}...], rationale, mode:'mechanical'}. Cheap-leaning signals (title keywords like 'typo'/'docstring'/'lint', 1 file, size 'xs'/'s') pull toward 'haiku'; expensive-leaning signals ('refactor'/'migration'/'auth', many files, touched resources, size 'l'/'xl') pull toward 'opus'. Use it to route a task to the cheapest sufficient model before spawning an executor. FOLLOW-UP (out of scope this pass): a second LLM-backed 'semantic' mode that reads the full item for a nuanced second opinion. It is categorised as a Read tool in the Meridian MCP Server, which means it retrieves data without modifying state.

What parameters does analyze_model_efficiency accept? +

analyze_model_efficiency accepts 6 parameters: size, files, title, file_count, description, touches_resources. The full parameter table on this page comes from the server's own tool schema.

How do I enforce a policy on analyze_model_efficiency? +

Register the Meridian MCP server in PolicyLayer and add a rule for analyze_model_efficiency: allow, deny, rate-limit, or require approval. Point your MCP client at the PolicyLayer proxy URL and the rule is enforced on every call, before it reaches Meridian. Nothing to install.

What risk level is analyze_model_efficiency? +

analyze_model_efficiency is a Read tool with low risk. Read-only tools are generally safe to allow by default.

Can I rate-limit analyze_model_efficiency? +

Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the analyze_model_efficiency rule in your PolicyLayer policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.

How do I block analyze_model_efficiency completely? +

Set action: deny in the PolicyLayer policy for analyze_model_efficiency. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.

What MCP server provides analyze_model_efficiency? +

analyze_model_efficiency is provided by the Meridian MCP server (@meridianmcp/mcp). PolicyLayer sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.

More on Meridian, and thousands of servers like it.

// THE MCP REGISTRY

PolicyLayer tracks 44,603 MCP servers and 515,000+ tools.

Every server has a live record: who publishes it, whether it answers without auth, its risk grade, every tool classified, the recommended policy. This page is one line of Meridian's. Pull the full record:

Teams ship this data inside their own products. See what a licence covers →

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.