AI agents invoke go_back to trigger actions in InSite. What it does depends on the arguments the agent supplies, and its effects often reach beyond the immediate call — builds kicked off, notifications sent, workflows started.
This tool triggers a browser navigation action, changing the browser's state by moving back in history. It's an external browser operation whose effects depend on the current navigation context, fitting the Execute category. Misuse could disrupt automated workflows or navigate away from critical pages mid-task.
From the tool's definition Navigate back in browser history
Attacks that exploit this kind of access
Navigate back in browser history. It is categorised as a Execute tool in the InSite MCP Server, which means it can trigger actions or run processes. Use rate limits and argument validation.
Register the InSite MCP server in PolicyLayer and add a rule for go_back: allow, deny, rate-limit, or require approval. Point your MCP client at the PolicyLayer proxy URL and the rule is enforced on every call, before it reaches InSite. Nothing to install.
go_back is a Execute tool with high risk. Execute tools should be rate-limited and have argument validation enabled.
Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the go_back rule in your PolicyLayer policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.
Set action: deny in the PolicyLayer policy for go_back. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.
go_back is provided by the InSite MCP server (jowharshamshiri/insite). PolicyLayer sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.
Every MCP server has a record like this.
Type a name, get the same breakdown: verified identity, auth posture, risk grade, capabilities, recommended policy.
Teams ship this data inside their own products. See what a licence covers →