AI agents call trigger_manual_intervention as a supporting operation in Mcp Bbs workflows.
The description is empty, making it impossible to determine with confidence what this tool does. The name 'trigger_manual_intervention' suggests it may signal or notify a human operator to take over, which could be an Execute-type action (triggering an external operation), but without any description, the exact behavior is unknown.
From the tool's definition Tool name is 'trigger_manual_intervention'; description is empty and uninformative.
Attacks that exploit this kind of access
trigger_manual_intervention. It is categorised as a Other tool in the Mcp Bbs MCP Server, which means it performs auxiliary operations.
Register the Mcp Bbs MCP server in PolicyLayer and add a rule for trigger_manual_intervention: allow, deny, rate-limit, or require approval. Point your MCP client at the PolicyLayer proxy URL and the rule is enforced on every call, before it reaches Mcp Bbs. Nothing to install.
trigger_manual_intervention is a Other tool with low risk. Read-only tools are generally safe to allow by default.
Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the trigger_manual_intervention rule in your PolicyLayer policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.
Set action: deny in the PolicyLayer policy for trigger_manual_intervention. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.
trigger_manual_intervention is provided by the Mcp Bbs MCP server (livingstaccato/mcp-bbs). PolicyLayer sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.
Every MCP server has a record like this.
Type a name, get the same breakdown: verified identity, auth posture, risk grade, capabilities, recommended policy.
Teams ship this data inside their own products. See what a licence covers →