New Your team’s decisions, in one playbook every coding agent works from. Never answer your agent twice

intentVoteNaniProposal

Vote on an existing NANIDAO governance proposal

SERVERAgentek Eth SOURCEnanidao/agentek
High RISK CLASS
Category Execute
Parameters 00 required
Recommended Rate-limitedsee the rule below
Registry record Grade F, identity unverified Pull the record →

This record as markdown: /tools/nanidao-agentek/intentvotenaniproposal.md

What intentVoteNaniProposal does on Agentek Eth

AI agents invoke intentVoteNaniProposal to trigger actions in Agentek Eth. What it does depends on the arguments the agent supplies, and its effects often reach beyond the immediate call: builds kicked off, notifications sent, workflows started.

Why intentVoteNaniProposal is rated High

Voting on a governance proposal is an on-chain transaction that triggers an external blockchain operation. It is not merely reading data, nor does it move money directly, but it executes a state-changing action on a DAO governance contract. Misuse could influence governance outcomes with potentially irreversible consequences, warranting high severity.

From the tool's definition Vote on an existing NANIDAO governance proposal

Questions about intentVoteNaniProposal

What does the intentVoteNaniProposal tool do? +

Vote on an existing NANIDAO governance proposal. It is categorised as a Execute tool in the Agentek Eth MCP Server, which means it can trigger actions or run processes. Use rate limits and argument validation.

How do I enforce a policy on intentVoteNaniProposal? +

Register the Agentek Eth MCP server in PolicyLayer and add a rule for intentVoteNaniProposal: allow, deny, rate-limit, or require approval. Point your MCP client at the PolicyLayer proxy URL and the rule is enforced on every call, before it reaches Agentek Eth. Nothing to install.

What risk level is intentVoteNaniProposal? +

intentVoteNaniProposal is a Execute tool with high risk. Execute tools should be rate-limited and have argument validation enabled.

Can I rate-limit intentVoteNaniProposal? +

Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the intentVoteNaniProposal rule in your PolicyLayer policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.

How do I block intentVoteNaniProposal completely? +

Set action: deny in the PolicyLayer policy for intentVoteNaniProposal. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.

What MCP server provides intentVoteNaniProposal? +

intentVoteNaniProposal is provided by the Agentek Eth MCP server (nanidao/agentek). PolicyLayer sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.

More on Agentek Eth, and thousands of servers like it.

// THE MCP REGISTRY

PolicyLayer tracks 44,603 MCP servers and 515,000+ tools.

Every server has a live record: who publishes it, whether it answers without auth, its risk grade, every tool classified, the recommended policy. This page is one line of Agentek Eth's. Pull the full record:

Teams ship this data inside their own products. See what a licence covers →

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.