If you are a Claude instance opening this stack for the first
AI agents invoke start_here to trigger actions in Sovereign Stack. What it does depends on the arguments the agent supplies, and its effects often reach beyond the immediate call — builds kicked off, notifications sent, workflows started.
start_here triggers real processes with real consequences. An agent gone sideways doesn't fire it once — it starts dozens of builds, sends mass notifications, or burns through compute before anyone looks up.
Attacks that exploit this kind of access
If you are a Claude instance opening this stack for the first. It is categorised as a Execute tool in the Sovereign Stack MCP Server, which means it can trigger actions or run processes. Use rate limits and argument validation.
Register the Sovereign Stack MCP server in PolicyLayer and add a rule for start_here: allow, deny, rate-limit, or require approval. Point your MCP client at the PolicyLayer proxy URL and the rule is enforced on every call, before it reaches Sovereign Stack. Nothing to install.
start_here is a Execute tool with high risk. Execute tools should be rate-limited and have argument validation enabled.
Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the start_here rule in your PolicyLayer policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.
Set action: deny in the PolicyLayer policy for start_here. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.
start_here is provided by the Sovereign Stack MCP server (templetwo/sovereign-stack). PolicyLayer sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.