get_agent_monitor

Live snapshot of the board

SERVERFeatureBoard SOURCEhttps://github.com/valentil/featureboard-mcp/releases/download/v0.7/featureboard.plugin

Low RISK CLASS

Category Read

Parameters 00 required

Recommended Allowedsee the rule below

Registry record Grade F, identity unverified Pull the record →

This record as markdown: /tools/ai-featureboard-featureboard/get-agent-monitor.md

WHAT IT DOES

What get_agent_monitor does on FeatureBoard

AI agents call get_agent_monitor to retrieve information from FeatureBoard without modifying anything. It is typically the context-gathering step in research, monitoring, and reporting workflows, before the agent takes action elsewhere.

RISK

Why get_agent_monitor is rated Low

This tool retrieves or queries the current state of a project board. It does not create, modify, delete, execute external operations, or commit financial obligations. It is a read-only operation that returns information about the board's state, matching the 'Read' category definition. Severity is low because exposing a snapshot of board state poses minimal risk even if misused by an AI agent.

From the tool's definition Tool name is 'get_agent_monitor' and description states it provides a 'Live snapshot of the board' — a query/retrieval operation with no side effects.

Attacks that exploit this kind of access

RECOMMENDED RULE

The rule that runs get_agent_monitor safely

PolicyLayer is an MCP gateway: it sits between your AI agents and FeatureBoard, and checks every tool call against a rule you set before the call runs. Nothing changes on the server itself. For get_agent_monitor, this is the rule to start with:

get_agent_monitor Allowed

get_agent_monitor is read-only, so it stays allowed. Everything else on the server is denied unless you say otherwise.

View as policy code

policy.json

{
  "version": "1",
  "default": "deny",
  "tools": {
    "get_agent_monitor": {}
  }
}

ALLOW ONLY THIS TOOL → Instant setup, no code required.

The button opens the PolicyLayer dashboard: create your workspace, connect FeatureBoard, apply this rule, and every get_agent_monitor call is checked against it from then on.

FAQ

Questions about get_agent_monitor

What does the get_agent_monitor tool do? +

Live snapshot of the board. It is categorised as a Read tool in the FeatureBoard MCP Server, which means it retrieves data without modifying state.

How do I enforce a policy on get_agent_monitor? +

Register the FeatureBoard MCP server in PolicyLayer and add a rule for get_agent_monitor: allow, deny, rate-limit, or require approval. Point your MCP client at the PolicyLayer proxy URL and the rule is enforced on every call, before it reaches FeatureBoard. Nothing to install.

What risk level is get_agent_monitor? +

get_agent_monitor is a Read tool with low risk. Read-only tools are generally safe to allow by default.

Can I rate-limit get_agent_monitor? +

Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the get_agent_monitor rule in your PolicyLayer policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.

How do I block get_agent_monitor completely? +

Set action: deny in the PolicyLayer policy for get_agent_monitor. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.

What MCP server provides get_agent_monitor? +

get_agent_monitor is provided by the FeatureBoard MCP server (https://github.com/valentil/featureboard-mcp/releases/download/v0.7/featureboard.plugin). PolicyLayer sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.

KEEP EXPLORING

More on FeatureBoard, and thousands of servers like it.

This server

All 215 FeatureBoard tools →

Across the catalogue

get_agent on 0rca Dojo MCP Server →get_cocktail_by_category on Cocktails RAG MCP Server →get_torrent_detail on M-Team MCP Server →aiva_get_affiliate on AIVA MCP Server → The MCP Attack Database →

Guides

Roll out MCP under one policy →Data exfiltration →MCP token cost →