New Your team’s decisions, in one playbook every coding agent works from. Never answer your agent twice

cao_verifier

WHEN a scene is composed and BEFORE cao_pdf / cao_generer_dxf / cao_rendu / cao_visite_plan / cao_visite_studio — the cheap check that stops a wrong plan or broken 4K visit from being delivered. FREE geometric audit of a CAO scene (no API key, 0 units). Detects the mistakes that make planches loo...

SERVERImmobilier SOURCEhttps://synergieloc.fr/mcp
Critical RISK CLASS
Category Destructive
Parameters 120 required
Recommended Hiddensee the rule below
Registry record Grade F, identity unverified Pull the record →

This record as markdown: /tools/fr-synergieloc-immobilier/cao-verifier.md

What cao_verifier does on Immobilier

AI agents call cao_verifier to permanently remove resources in Immobilier, typically in cleanup and lifecycle workflows. It does its job in a single call, and there is no undo.

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
murs array — Walls: plan segments extruded vertically. Every coordinate in this whole scene is in MILLIMETRES, in a single plan frame whose origin you choose — X to the righ
plan array — 2D reference lines — drawn flat, never extruded and never counted in the quantities. Use them for axes, plot limits or setting-out marks.
boites array — Boxes (furniture, volumes): a rectangular block placed by its CENTRE, not by a corner. Millimetres, same frame as murs[].
georef object — Optional Lambert-93 (EPSG:2154) false origin for IfcMapConversion. Local millimetres are scaled by 0.001 to CRS metres. Do not invent coordinates: omit est/nord
cercles array — Circles on the 2D plan, alongside plan[] lines: each has a centre and a radius, in the same unit as the plan. Use for round shapes a polyline would render badly
reseaux array — Plumbing pipe runs (EF/EC/EU/EV/EP/chauffage) — used only by cao_pdf (technical plan + linear-meter quantities per type).
toitures array — Roofs — used only by cao_pdf. WITHOUT this field: a flat roof is auto-generated over the footprint of ALL walls (legacy default). WITH it: compose freely — each
plomberie array — Sanitary fixtures (sink, WC, shower…) — used only by cao_pdf. Same positioning as electricite.
decoration array — Paint/finish per wall — used only by cao_pdf. Colors the elevations (exterior face) and the axonometric view (face auto-detected by orientation relative to the
ouvertures array — Doors/windows embedded in a wall — used only by cao_pdf (elevations + axonometric view), no effect on dxf/metres.
electricite array — Electrical symbols (outlets, switches, lights…) — used only by cao_pdf (dedicated technical plan + quantities), no effect on dxf/metres/render. Position: attach
compositions object — Named wall/slab layer sets declared by the project. A key that matches an inferred kind (mur_exterieur, refend, cloison, plancher, toiture) or murs[].compositio

Parameters from the server's own tool schema.

Why cao_verifier is rated Critical

An AI agent that decides to call cao_verifier doesn't hesitate, doesn't double-check, and doesn't stop at one. Whatever it removes from Immobilier is gone. There is no undo for destructive operations.

Risk signalsHigh parameter count (94 properties) · Bulk/mass operation — affects multiple targets

Questions about cao_verifier

What does the cao_verifier tool do? +

WHEN a scene is composed and BEFORE cao_pdf / cao_generer_dxf / cao_rendu / cao_visite_plan / cao_visite_studio — the cheap check that stops a wrong plan or broken 4K visit from being delivered. FREE geometric audit of a CAO scene (no API key, 0 units). Detects the mistakes that make planches look wrong: openings.z used as absolute altitude instead of relative sill (allège), chien_assis dormers floating outside the roof, upper storey walls with no windows, guardrails far from the building, missing stairs between floors, openings overflowing their wall. ALSO checks that a staircase actually leads somewhere (escalier_traverse_mur — the flight runs into a partition of its own level; escalier_arrivee_hors_batiment — it lands outside the walls). STAIRCASE PLACEMENT is checked in full, because a stair dropped in an absurd spot is the most visible flaw of an AI-composed model: escalier_depart_hors_batiment (it starts in the void), escalier_volee_hors_batiment (the flight leaves the building on the way up), escalier_bloque_ouverture (it seals a doorway), escalier_z_hors_niveau (it floats between two slabs), escalier_hauteur_incoherente (it stops short of the floor above), escalier_chevauche (two flights in the same footprint), and escalier_sans_appui (free-standing mid-room — a WARNING, not blocking: an open stairwell is a legitimate choice). Each one comes with a correctifs[] entry carrying a REAL replacement position (x/y/rotation): the closest valid spot to what you asked for, backed against a wall, arriving in clear space and blocking no door. Apply with REST /api/v1/cao/integrite {appliquer:true, revalider:true} — you never have to guess where to put it. ALSO checks that a dormer sits on the slope (lucarne_profondeur_courte / _longue / lucarne_trop_haute — depth must be ≈ height / roof pitch, otherwise its roof floats above the slope or overshoots the ridge). Returns {ok, erreurs_schema, alertes[{code,severite,message,corriger}], conseils, resume}. Fix severite=critique before delivery. ALSO runs a full STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY check (is the building really closed and roofed?): enveloppe_percee — a wall end joins nothing (T-junctions and door jambs are recognised, so no false alarms) — murs_composantes_isolees — closed wall clusters / pillars / low walls scattered OUTSIDE the main envelope (the 'murs en vrac' Visite 4K defect; correctifs propose null = delete that wall) — bande_ouverte_entre_niveaux, mur_etage_sans_appui, toit_ouvert, toiture_sous_les_murs, ouvertures_chevauchantes, and the VOLUME CLASHES the IFC clash detector sees: mur_en_double, murs_superposes, mur_dans_une_baie (correctif slides the opening clear), volume_traverse_un_mur, volume_traverse_le_plafond, murs_qui_se_croisent (warning); pipe × wall crossings come back in reservations (sleeves to plan, not clashes). ALSO dalle_flottante / pilier_detache on orphan boxes. It returns integrite.correctifs[]: the exact field to write and the value to write there, e.g. {cible:'murs[3].x2', actuel:10400, propose:11000, raison:…} or {cible:'murs[12]', propose:null} to remove clutter. REST /api/v1/cao/integrite runs that check alone and can APPLY the fixes for you (appliquer:true, revalider:true) — also free, no key. Response includes regles_archi (buildingSMART-inspired principles). ALSO checks DOCUMENT COMPLETENESS (documents): the PDF planche delivers one full plan PER STOREY — 4 storeys means 4 complete plans — so it flags element_hors_plan (a stair/guardrail whose z attaches to no storey: it would vanish from EVERY plan), niveau_non_desservi (no stair ARRIVES at that storey and no lift covers it), arrivee_sans_protection (stair head without guardrail, NF P01-012), hauteur_niveau_insuffisante (<2200 mm). documents.couverture is the announced table of contents of the planche. Standalone: REST /api/v1/cao/documents (free, supports appliquer/revalider too). REST equivalent: /api/v1/cao/verifier. It is categorised as a Destructive tool in the Immobilier MCP Server, which means it can permanently delete or destroy data. Block by default and require explicit approval.

What parameters does cao_verifier accept? +

cao_verifier accepts 12 parameters: murs, plan, boites, georef, cercles, reseaux, toitures, plomberie, decoration, ouvertures, electricite, compositions. The full parameter table on this page comes from the server's own tool schema.

How do I enforce a policy on cao_verifier? +

Register the Immobilier MCP server in PolicyLayer and add a rule for cao_verifier: allow, deny, rate-limit, or require approval. Point your MCP client at the PolicyLayer proxy URL and the rule is enforced on every call, before it reaches Immobilier. Nothing to install.

What risk level is cao_verifier? +

cao_verifier is a Destructive tool with critical risk. Critical-risk tools should be blocked by default and only enabled with explicit human approval.

Can I rate-limit cao_verifier? +

Yes. Add a rate_limit block to the cao_verifier rule in your PolicyLayer policy. For example, setting max: 10 and window: 60 limits the tool to 10 calls per minute. Rate limits are tracked per agent session and reset automatically.

How do I block cao_verifier completely? +

Set action: deny in the PolicyLayer policy for cao_verifier. The AI agent will receive a policy violation error and cannot call the tool. You can also include a reason field to explain why the tool is blocked.

What MCP server provides cao_verifier? +

cao_verifier is provided by the Immobilier MCP server (https://synergieloc.fr/mcp). PolicyLayer sits as a proxy in front of this server to enforce policies before tool calls reach the server.

More on Immobilier, and thousands of servers like it.

// THE MCP REGISTRY

PolicyLayer tracks 44,603 MCP servers and 515,000+ tools.

Every server has a live record: who publishes it, whether it answers without auth, its risk grade, every tool classified, the recommended policy. This page is one line of Immobilier's. Pull the full record:

Teams ship this data inside their own products. See what a licence covers →

// GET IN TOUCH

Have a question or want to learn more? Send us a message.

Message sent.

We'll get back to you soon.